step one. But really, from inside the genealogy and family history, we-all knowthat for each code there’s an exclusion. A beneficial vexing section ofgenealogy is that no body very knows just how to apply the newest exclusions orrules with people decisive adjective such usually, perhaps, probably,most likely, an such like. It could be interesting in the event that around other advice ofjointures are made a year otherwise one or two immediately after a well-known marriage go out.
2. Will there be a keen extant dispensation on the matrimony off ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise fourth cousins, after taken off the new fifth LordClifford? That would narrow down its marriage big date.
Arthur
Allegedly, if the a great dispensation is actually found and you can supplied, it might havebeen by one of the pursuing the, and can even appear in this new correspondingregister publication, in the event it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1509-1520
5. If your tenth Lord Clifford really does marry during the early 1487 [say January] andhas Age later on in that 12 months, does the new chronology maybe not performs?
John arms?
E created for the later 1487, Henry born inside 1488/nine, Joan into the ,etcetera. filling in the new brands of one’s upload out of . If (a) thechronology however work; and you may (b) her wedding piece wasn’t low; thenwe only have new 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that’s inside the oppositionto the fresh supposition that she is actually a valid daughter.
6. About your 1505 pedigree: Is the Clifford daughters the new onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Were there others? If so,would not one echo improperly on this document given that a resource?
Of comparisons I’ve made from the newest c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith the latest 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s North pedigrees, being
Regarding the c.1505 Relations pedigrees, brand new Clifford children are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively throughout the St. John pedigree. Due to the fact I’mnot accustomed the newest St. John family members, following ‘s the guidance asit looks throughout the c.1505 pedigree, since the taken from brand new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. article. The latest phrasing in the quotations is precisely because it seems inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Off my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess off Somerset had about three husbands.” By “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Woman the brand new Jersey, GA sexy girls King’s Mother.” that has “The fresh new Queen.” whohad “Prince “Of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic husband.” she got step 3 daus & dos sons:
A beneficial. “Edith, wedded so you’re able to Geoffrey Pole out-of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married with the Lady Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke off Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternate child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Five daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. away from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun regarding Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and you can sistren.” Having issueindicated, yet not called.C2. “Elizabeth, married so you’re able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, married first to the Lord Zouche; immediately after to your LordScrope out-of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated however entitled.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. regarding K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”