Nonetheless, they remains offered to the reader means that it really works, which is the substance away from emptiness
Medical studies, try actions, efficiency and you may interpretations try conceived regarding brain, plus creative imagination and you may term and you may design coding. Best revealing from overall performance is also crucial. Particularly in theoretical physics, linguistic ability and you will carefulness when you are writing are becoming a more pressing need from inside the the latest victims in the horizons away from present studies. There are folks from almost every other industries who will be ready to misunderstand and you may ignite too many discourses/conclusions; they generate guides of several bytes of information for example “yes/no/maybe”; for that reason, nonscience or occult misinformation exists, types of and this abound on fields out of unique relativity idea and you will quantum physics. Ergo, science ought not to make use of the sentences you to definitely served the brand new Paleolithic mind. Category: Standard Research and you will Thinking
Trappist-step 1 Star System
The new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will soon transcend what the Hubble could have been capable discuss. One of their very first purpose will likely be the brand new TRAPPIST-1 superstar program in the Aquarius. That it article explores why you to puny yellow dwarf is so interesting, and exactly why the brand new hunt for alien existence variations e. Category: General Science and you may Beliefs
Physical dimensions like “mass”, “length”, “charge”, represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are , but used as to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like “$m\to 0$”, “$r\to 0$”, “$q\to 0$”, used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because “$ m$”, “$r$”, “$q$” represent with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and “$0$” represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement “$\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge” in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where “physico-mathematical” signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of “self inquiry”, “middle way”, “dependent origination”, “emptiness/relational existence”, which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of “definition”; the relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of “zero quantity” and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated “limiting process” of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy